[ShloobeR]

Heh, ler.

[Trev-MUN]

Emalkay's right; you don't really hear of Agnostics getting all uppity about how they're superior beings to religious/theistic believers. That's something you hear from athiest evangelists, really; specifically, those who are secular humanists and naturalists or others of that vein, whose primary belief is that there is nothing divine or supernatural. They actively reject the idea of a god/gods and other things of the sort.

At least, in theory. Someone might run around doing this and styling themselves agnostic, but by classification they'd likely be different.

Agnostics really are that sort of gray area, because they don't reject, deny, or accept anything--they think that knowledge of the divine or supernatural is unknowable and thus don't give it much thought. Of course, individual agnostics have their own a/theistic tendencies too, tinting their greyness ...

At any rate, Ler, it's never good to be like Luke Drelick and assume all of one religion/group/etc. are bad or undesirable or pricks or what have you.

With that, I shall now pay RoSS to piss on the fire before it burns everything up.

This post has been edited by Trev-MUN: 16 July 2005 - 12:44 PM

[hob nado]

I will write a program in C++ that reads in a stream of characters from a DMZX political thread and converts them to MegaZeux tiles; it will make us the most productive MegaZeux community ever!

GUY #1: SO GUYS, MEGAZEUX
GUY #2: GOVERNMENT
.
.
.
GUY #10: [STACK OF FIFTEEN RECURSIVELY QUOTED AND REBUTTED POSTS]

I guess I gotta hand it to you guys for keeping it civil, though. DMZX 4 lyfe <3

[djtiesto]

Trev-MUN, on Jul 16 2005, 12:43 PM, said:

At any rate, Ler, it's never good to be like Luke Drelick and assume all of one religion/group/etc. are bad or undesirable or pricks or what have you.

No need for senseless trolling.

This post has been edited by djtiesto: 16 July 2005 - 06:23 PM

[Seventh Shade]

I like how everyone says making inflamatory posts about religion and politics is bad but then does so at every possible opportunity.

This post has been edited by Seventh Shade: 16 July 2005 - 07:19 PM

[Exophase]

Seventh Shade, on Jul 16 2005, 02:19 PM, said:

I like how everyone says making inflamatory posts about religion and politics is bad but then does so at every possible opportunity.

I like your generalization and exaggeration.. wait, no, I don't like it at ALL. :|

- Exo

[Dr_Dos]

emalkay, on Jul 16 2005, 01:19 AM, said:

or he could just run round naked in his spare time, the naked body is beautiful afterall.

You obviously haven't seen Ler's.

[Skylark]

this thread sux =(

[Pyro1588]

well, i was going to reply and try to redeem myself from a couple of really stupid arguements and one that i was going to try and rescue, but i've already fallen two pages behind and this is taking too much of my extremely limited internet time, so i think i'll just bow out right now. it's been fun.
good luck everyone.

[Koji]

WHO NEEDS GOVERNMENT ANYWAY!?

I'm a supporter of anarchy!

[Skylark]

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is basically all the shitty text in this thread summed up for those who don't want to read k

This post has been edited by Skylark: 17 July 2005 - 03:04 AM

[Koji]

Who's birthday was it? =3

[cornsalt]

yeah i'm going to have to agree with emalkay on this
i think the president would have to be gay so he can lead the fight for women's rights and in order to keep the population down he would have to declare half of the population gay (probably just the religious ones in order to keep their numbers down as well)
gay marriage would be encouraged by tax breaks and so would legalized gambling.

This post has been edited by cornsalt: 18 July 2005 - 12:18 AM

[Koji]

....

[asgromo]

Skylark, on Jul 16 2005, 09:37 PM, said:

this thread sux =(

Good for Skylark to realize this thread was far too civil a conversation to stay in action. I think we should consider ourselves fortunate to have so skilled a resident asshole on the forum.

:teach:

[ShloobeR]

:teach:

[Skylark]

asgromo, on Jul 18 2005, 05:24 PM, said:

Skylark, on Jul 16 2005, 09:37 PM, said:

this thread sux =(

Good for Skylark to realize this thread was far too civil a conversation to stay in action. I think we should consider ourselves fortunate to have so skilled a resident asshole on the forum.

:teach:

I wouldn't consider political bullshit to be civil conversation. This is just a not-so-subtly disguised method for Luke Drelick to troll his crap (as he has been doing frequently lately) and I thought that political discussions were supposed to be canned anyway. So far all that's been talked about is peoples stance on gay marriages, abortion, racism, George Bush/America's regime and a bunch of other conservationist/socialist/communist/capitalist/alloftheabove shit. I thought a civil conversation involved more than:

Luke: legalise majijuana
pyro: no
Luke: yes
pyro: no
someone else: yes

So I thought I'd put my political views on the board, by disagreeing with everyone's view, since they are all obsolete.

And don't think that you're better than me by attacking my sarcasm with your dull wit because you aren't.

hey nw caling ppls asholes iz aginst the rules some1 rase his warn level

But since this is just going to turn into yet another Skylark vs Asgromo thread (as nearly every thread I post in is now) I will leave you to demand that your opinion is better than someone elses, even though it isn't and even if it was who gives a shit.

politics =

[asgromo]

Two retards babbling at each other over who gets the toy is a civil situation. It's not until they start hitting each other that their interaction has to end. I don't know why you keep being the first retard to throw a lame slap.

Point out where political discourse was banned, please. No, I'll help. It wasn't. That's why this thread stayed up for any period of time. Whatthefuckever. You list off a bunch of conservationist/socialist/communist/capitalist/alloftheabove shit, demeaning it because you somehow forgot that conservationist/socialist/communist/capitalist/ alloftheabove shit actually encompasses the greater part of modern politics.

So what about Luke Drelick? Of course he's "trolling his crap". He does it all the time. He's always done it, far back into people's memories. Nobody even cares anymore, because Drelick always keeps it cool. Call it his trip. You're trip is clearly going off on a tirade online because you at least want to look like you're thinking at a higher level than the rest of us. As far as I can tell. It doesn't matter anyway.

So yeah, keep throwing around this nihilistic bullshit that no one cares about what anyone has to say and we're all just specks on a beach and whatever the fuck else it is you rant. Or let other people have their retard fun online and go outside or something. I'm going outside. The air conditioning is broken. Jesus.

[Castlevania]

*sigh* Well, it was good while it lasted...sort of. Personally, I blame Exophase for all this. j/k

[cornsalt]

yeah down with the dean :teach:

[Dr Lancer-X]

ABORTION

[djtiesto]

Skylark - What are you talking about, trolling? I kept it civil, backed up my points, never resorted to name-calling. Maybe you should look up the definition of a "troll" before making false accusations.

[Pyro1588]

actually, i thought this thread held together pretty well for a political thread. i just need to learn to stop posting long replies when i'm tired or distracted because then i don't make any sense.

[Nash]

Lancer-X, on Jul 18 2005, 04:59 PM, said:

ABORTION

yum

This post has been edited by nashizzle: 19 July 2005 - 03:59 AM

[Castlevania]

Aghhh, it's the infamous fetus-eater!

[Trev-MUN]

The funny thing about all this? Es said "I guess I gotta hand it to you guys for keeping it civil, though." ... And right after he leaves, everything went STRAIGHT TO HELL. D:

In addition, I now have a mental image of a pink-haired catgirl who is really a man with tears streaming down his face yelling "ABORTION!"

This post has been edited by Trev-MUN: 19 July 2005 - 05:13 AM

[Skylark]

Directed at asgromo:

If I'm the first retard to throw a slap doesn't that mean you have to be the worst down-syndrome patient in the world to slap back? Don't give me this bullshit about "You're trip is clearly going off on a tirade online because you at least want to look like you're thinking at a higher level than the rest of us", because it seems to me that YOUR *cough*NOT YOU'RE FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME*cough* trip is to trip on my trip. SO STOP TRIPPING.

I thought it was pretty obvious that when I said "conservationist/socialist/communist/capitalist/alloftheabove" I was addressing EVERYONE. That was the point, but you seem to have trouble picking up "points".

"Point out where political discourse was banned, please. No, I'll help. It wasn't. "

Political discussion is frowned upon in general on these boards. Hence the use of the word "canned". Thank you so much for actually READING MY POST.

/"nihilistic ranting"



pretend the blue guy is politics and other guy is me

PS: Luke I don't know if this whole "I really care about the world" is a load of shit or whether you've just had way too much therapy since the old days but it's really wearing thin on me. And marijuana kills people, so why the hell should it be legalised?

And I wasn't just referring to this thread. In general you are pulling this political crap. Sorry but I just don't like it. =(

This post has been edited by Skylark: 19 July 2005 - 08:05 AM

[Dr Lancer-X]

I am most times not liking what politicians thinks about.

[ShloobeR]

Skylark, on Jul 19 2005, 09:20 AM, said:

PS: Luke I don't know if this whole "I really care about the world" is a load of shit or whether you've just had way too much therapy since the old days but it's really wearing thin on me. And marijuana kills people, so why the hell should it be legalised?

Marijuana doesn't kill people, everything does.

[Skylark]

EDIT: And marijuana kills people at a faster rate than would normally be seen in the average american, so why the hell should it be legalised?

For you fusspots. =)