Terryn: Created page with "

Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores Topics:	General -	Trust 	Specific -	The Internet  Judgment Criteria: Gameplay, 70/300  Gameplay is the meat of any MZX g..."

2011-10-17T04:54:32Z

Created page with "<pre>Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores Topics: General - Trust Specific - The Internet Judgment Criteria: Gameplay, 70/300 Gameplay is the meat of any MZX g..."

New page

<pre>Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores
Topics: General - Trust
Specific - The Internet

Judgment Criteria:
Gameplay, 70/300
Gameplay is the meat of any MZX game. It describes the mechanical
functionality of the game; basically the level of interactivity. Does the
game provide varied and complex mechanics? Is it simple and intuitive to learn
how to play, yet challenging? How much is the player involved in actually
playing the game? Gameplay features include intuitive control, length,
challenge, variation, how solid/buggy the engines are, how complex the engines
are, replayability factor, secrets, and overall, just how fun the typical game
player will find it. Solid gameplay is essential for any truly good MZX game.

Graphics, 50/300
The graphics score rates the level of attraction and eye candy the game has to
offer. In MZX, this concerns level of char editing, detail, shading,
dithering, palette use, etc. How many char sets and char edits are used, how
well your colors complement each other, and how much variation in the design
of the boards are key factors involved. Additionally, level of animation,
fading, transitions, and other effects can impact this score. Clarity and
expressiveness are yet another factor; do the graphics complement well the
mood of the game? Is it easy to discern what they're trying to represent? Are
they appropriately realistic? Basically, chances are the less the game looks
like text mode, the better the graphics will be. Overall graphics can add a
strong additional value to a game, particularly a short DoZ one. Poor graphics
can make a game unappealing and even boring.

Plot, 45/300
Plot describes how well and thought out the presentation behind the game
is. Typically it concerns aspects such as background story, story development,
dialogue, characters, and literary form. It asks how believable and true to
life scenarios and characters are. However, in some games other aspects are
emphasized, such as humor, and this can fulfill the requirements of a healthy
plot. Most MZX games will be in some way plot oriented, but some may require
plot less than others. Even so, NO MZX game should be without a plot, and
further levels of plot can enhance any gaming experience. Games will be judged
accordingly based on how much plot is given as is deemed necessary for the
type of game submitted.

Theme, 40/300
The theme topic first asks how well the given game adheres to one of the two
given themes. However, to get a truly good score in this topic, the game
should do an exceptionally good job at adhering to the theme and go above and
beyond in expressing this. This adherence should be in-depth and not
superficial or forced. It will also be noted how creatively the theme is
utilized, and overall how much the game leaves an impression of that theme
having been ingrained within it. Exceptional usage of theme should make the
player reflect upon the significance of the theme after having played the
game.

Innovation, 35/300
Innovation considers how different and exciting the game is. Does it use
things never before seen in MZX, or perhaps does it use something familiar but
in an entirely different way? Part of the appeal of any game is how much of a
different, unique experience it has to offer. Innovation asks how much the
game stands out on its own with a unique identity.

Discretion, 20/300
This category is partially used as wanted by the judges; if there are any
exceptional values or flaws the game presents that are not covered within the
other scores, here is the place to reflect upon it. Discretion not only
considers the discretion of the judges, but that of the players as well. The
judges are urged to ask themselves how much good taste and common sense is
used in the game, and judge accordingly here. Factors such as unecessarily
excessive profanity or vulgarity may result in a lowered discretion score;

Music, 35/300
The music category quetsions the overall aural quality of the game. Both
quantity and quality are looked at here. A truly successful game will both
have tracks that are high quality and pleasing to the ear and will have many
different ones for different occasions. Are the pieces long, or short and
repetitive? Are they annoying and disharmonic? More importantly, do they fit
the mood of the circumstances within the game? Do note that bad music is not
necessarily better than no music. In fact, the judge may give a 1 for no
music, and a 0 for exceptionally annoying music. In general, music is an
important aspect that can help keep the player's prolonged interest in the
game, as well as get a better feel for the mood and message the game is
presenting.

Sound, 5/300
The sound category pertains to sound effects in sample files (.sams). First,
are they used at all? If so, do they help the game come to life or more
exciting? Sound effects can further enhance the experience of a game; however,
they can also have a detrimental effect. As with the music category, annoying
sounds may warrant a 0 in the sound category whereas no sounds may have gotten
a 1. Basically, if any sound effects are so bad that they make you want to
turn off sound altogether, don't include them.

This part totals 300. This DoZ recycles an invention from the previous few
DoZ's, rank-weight:

Weight Rank, 100/100
Rank weight makes up the last 25% of the 400 point total given to a game.

The purpose of rank weight is for the judges to express their own opinions of
the game outside of the confines of the given score ranks. The reason this is
done is because not all judges will agree with the rank that their scores
produce because they may not think that a certain scored category should be
given as much weight as it has. It should be noted that rank weight is NOT
simply a listed reranking of the scored rank, but is purely the judges own
opinion.

The way weight rank works is fairly simply; the 100 points for this category
are split into X cutoff points where X is the number of teams
participating. The top ranking team gets the most points (100), and the lowest
ranking team gets the least (0). All teams inbetween get an appropriately
scaled value out of 100.

If you're interested in the mathematical formula regarding weight rank, it
goes like this: Rank weight score = ((number of players + 1) - rank)/(number
of players) * 100.

Overall each team receives a 400 point score from each judge. Since there will
be 5 judges, this results in an overall 2000 point score. These final scores
will be tabulated then ranked to derive the best of topic and best of show
awards.

Game Listing
Team Game Name Score Theme
0160 The Evil Internet Virus 137/300 INTERNET
0215 Lethal Recurse 154/300 TRUST
0222 Netsplit 182/300 INTERNET
0261 Dark Core 229/300 TRUST
0331 Net Wars 071/300 INTERNET
0344 Finite Space 067/300 INTERNET
0385 Gross Injustice 136/300 TRUST
0404 Serum 142/300 TRUST
0499 Shinrai 173/300 TRUST
0505 Vyznium 166/300 TRUST
0666 Depravity 193/300 TRUST
0776 WHY THE INTERNET IS BORING 027/300 INTERNET
0777 Hackers Can Turn Your Computer Into A Bomb 219/300 INTERNET
0787 Innernet 224/300 INTERNET
0810 Trust Falls 161/300 TRUST
1337 Paradigm AM 131/300 INTERNET
1347 Castlevania: Drum Solo of Discombobulation 126/300 TRUST
1777 Net Demon 031/300 INTERNET
4013 Hacker 123/300 INTERNET
6047 Convergence 117/300 TRUST

Scores

0160 The Evil Internet Virus (137/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (35/70)
There was really nothing outstanding about the gameplay which would give this
any points, and plenty of problems with it to take points away. Notably was
the inability to fire bullets when next to an enemy, and as they tend to swarm
you this became a problem. Also, while weapon switching did work, there wasn't
a major point to having multiple weapons besides having a fallback if you ran
out of ammo for a particular type. Rockets, especially, were next to useless,
and filling the screen with fire (default fire at that, see Graphics comments)
wasn't cool, especially since the fire trail started UNDER you. The speed
ability, while interesting, seemed similarly useless, and seemed to involve no
adverse affects for continued use besides taking longer to power up again. And
was it really necessary to have everything explode like that? Well, at least
there was plenty of health, I never saw a gameover screen. Ultimately, this
stands as a pretty mediocre game.
Graphics: (25/50)
The intro graphics are nothing special, though some points must be awarded for
taking the time to make them at all, since they weren't a detractor. Level
graphics were fairly bland, but reasonable for the type of game this was. The
major downfall here was the use of the fire graphic, mostly since, well, there
was so much of it to see. Going Caverns style with flashing gradiated blocks
would have been a better choice than this. Also, font-wise, the 'M' looked
like an 'X'.
Plot: (20/45)
Understanding that this sort of action shooter isn't really geared around a
plot so much as something more story intensive, it would still have been
worthwhile to include some progression of story from level to level. In
particular, it would have been a good idea to write an ending sequence with a
little more depth than simply "you're free". I can't believe this game took so
long to make that you didn't have time to do something more in that area.
Theme: (15/40)
Beyond the initial setup for the game, there was really very little about this
that felt like it had anything to do with the Internet. My vision of the
Internet, at least, doesn't involve non-descript cave looking areas and evil
Dr. Who robots. More attention to further graphical and/or plot development
might have improved the thematic relavence.
Innovation: (10/35)
Small points gained for the use of a custom Enter Menu interface, a somewhat
interesting speed ability, and a non-standard (though hardly unique) weapons
interface. Major points lost for use of the default fire graphic, and the fact
that none of the previously mentioned innovations actually mattered much as
far as the game was concerned. This was just a very blah game.
Discretion: (10/20)
Cursing for cursing's sake in the beginning sequence, several grammar and
spelling errors, and a generally unpolished feel lose the game points here.
Music: (20/35)
The music wasn't bad by any means, but none of it was actually appropriate to
the game, it was just sort of there. Music is intended to evoke an atmospheric
effect for the game. As it is, it's just a backdrop that neither compliments
nor improves upon that atmosphere. But it wasn't bad music, so hey.
Sound: (02/05)
Nothing particularly special about the sound, though the constant repitition
of the "Groovy" sound was a bit grating.
Total: (137/300)
This game is the very epitome of mediocrity. A perfect example of an utterly
unmemorable experience. Don't feel bad, you're average. Well, actually
slightly below average, but who's counting.

0215 Lethal Recurse (154/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (20/70)
Ugh, where to begin. The whole Kama blade thing probably seemed like a good
idea on paper, but in reality it just plain didn't work well. The reliance on
absolute directions as opposed to relative ones made the engine very hard to
use effectively, since you basically have to stop moving to attack. It would
have been a better decision to make the arrow keys relative to the direction
the player was currently facing, so that hitting control while moving would
always use the standard attack.
This is really just glossing over the fact that the game just plain wasn't
finished, at all. I almost wonder whether this was tested at all, since you
would have surely seen SOME of the problems if it was. Or perhaps the clunky
but extremely nice looking engine was meant to diguise the fact that there
were only two playable boards, and only the first one was actually playable.
Graphics: (45/50)
If there's anything I can say in this game's defense, the graphics were (with
a few minor glitches) superb. Really, really nice looking. Of course, there
was still the issue of graphical bugs, like the projectiles not showing up on
the second board, or getting stuck on enemies and turning into an 'L', or
enemies just disappearing into thin air, or the placement of that boss health
bar that obscured the screen... Come to think of it, I'm not sure why I'm
scoring this so high. I guess I just really liked the graphical style.
Plot: (20/45)
Well, the plot started out pretty interesting, although the text went by way
too fast. However, the game didn't really do anything with the plot after
that, mostly because the game didn't really do much of anything at all after
that. We never really had any indication of what all these fireball spitting
monsters had to do with anything, either.
Theme: (05/40)
However, while there was some semblance of a plot at the beginning, the theme
didn't fare so well. I couldn't really see any relation to the theme of Trust
at all, and while it would certainly have been possible for something to
develop over the course of the game, nothing ever did. This is the first case
in what appears to be a small trend this DoZ, of games that don't seem to
connect to the given theme much at all. In the future, this will merit
outright disqualification, so be warned.
Innovation: (20/35)
I'll give you this, I can say with almost total certainty that no one has
ever done something quite like this in MZX before. In that respect, you could
say this was a very innovative game just for that. However, you also can't
expect something to be considered innovative if it's a bad idea at the same
time. Maybe if it had worked slightly better...
Discretion: (10/20)
Super fast exposition text, clumsy game engine, irresponsible use of the
"commands" counter causing the game to halt up and FREEZE MY COMPUTER on game
over, and an overall unpolished feel...well, you can see where I'm going with
this.
Music: (30/35)
The music was another welcome positive in this game, and I felt it fit very
well. I could just be a sucker for the basekick, though. The only real
problem with the music was tied to the real problem with the game itself:
there simply wasn't enough of it, because there simply wasn't enough of the
game.
Sound: (04/05)
The sound was also appropriate and fit well. Not a whole lot else to say
about that.
Total: (154/300)
Please, please, PLEASE play your DoZ game through AT LEAST once before you
submit it. You'll be amazed at how many stupid (and not so stupid) errors
this helps you catch. Of course, you may have realized the game over bug, and
simply not known what was causing it, simply not having the coding experience
to realize that that's what can happen if you set commands to 32867.
Oh, right, the game. The clunky game engine was little more than a mask in
front of a sadly unfinished shell of a game. On the plus side, the graphics
were really nice.

0222 Netsplit (182/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (30/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (25/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (30/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (35/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (20/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (15/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (02/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (182/300)
/* Comments */

0261 Dark Core (229/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (65/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (40/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (30/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (15/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (30/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (20/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (04/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (229/300)
/* Comments */

0331 Net Wars (071/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (05/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (20/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (10/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (20/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (05/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (00/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (071/300)
/* Comments */

0344 Finite Space (067/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (00/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (20/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (30/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (15/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (00/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (00/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (01/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (067/300)
/* Comments */

0385 Gross Injustice (136/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (35/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (20/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (25/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (35/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (05/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (05/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (136/300)
/* Comments */

0404 Serum (142/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (20/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (30/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (25/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (15/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (15/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (10/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (02/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (142/300)
/* Comments */

0499 Shinrai (173/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (50/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (45/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (10/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (15/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (20/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (05/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (03/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (173/300)
/* Comments */

0505 Vyznium (166/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (45/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (20/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (25/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (20/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (15/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (15/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (166/300)
/* Comments */

0666 Depravity (193/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (30/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (40/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (30/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (25/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (10/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (30/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (03/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (193/300)
/* Comments */

0776 WHY THE INTERNET IS BORING (027/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (00/70)
I'm sorry, could someone point out where the GAME was?
Graphics: (05/50)
I give you some credit only because the graphics weren't eye-stabbingly
painful to look at. This must have taken you all of two minutes to do.
Plot: (00/45)
There was no plot, and since I can't imagine any plot handicap would be
awarded to the "Joke Game" genre, this gets squat.
Theme: (20/40)
The word Internet WAS in the title, and the game (such as it were) did involve
the Internet as its exclusive focus. Consider these pity points.
Innovation: (00/35)
I could get just about the same experience this game provided by loafing on a
patio and watching paint dry. I mean, it wasn't even a particularly clever
joke game, come on!
Discretion: (00/20)
As a busy person trying to fit DoZ judging into an already full schedule,
things like this are almost vulgar. For wasting my time, you can feel my ire.
Music: (01/35)
No music.
Sound: (01/05)
No sound.
Total: (027/300)
If you don't want to compete in the DoZ, then don't enter to begin with. Hey,
if the Internet is so boring, why bother hanging around the MZX community at
all? I promise we won't miss things like this at all.

0777 Hackers Can Turn Your Computer Into A Bomb (219/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (70/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (40/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (20/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (10/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (35/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (15/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (04/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (219/300)
/* Comments */

0787 Innernet (224/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (65/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (30/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (25/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (30/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (20/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (25/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (04/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (224/300)
/* Comments */

0810 Trust Falls (161/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (35/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (25/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (30/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (25/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (15/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (10/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (20/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (161/300)
/* Comments */

1337 Paradigm AM (131/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (15/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (25/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (15/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (25/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (00/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (20/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (131/300)
/* Comments */

1347 Castlevania: Drum Solo of Discombobulation (126/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (50/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (20/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (20/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (10/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (00/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (15/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (126/300)
/* Comments */

1777 Net Demon (031/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (05/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (10/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (00/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (05/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (00/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (00/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (031/300)
/* Comments */

4013 Hacker (123/300) INTERNET
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (30/70)
This was an interesting idea, it really was. Unfortunately it was also not
implemented to its full potential. While the concept of playing as a hacking
program has numerous possibilities, a sword engine on large empty boards
sparsly populated with enemies isn't the one I would have chosen.
Graphics: (15/50)
The graphics are a major stumbling block for this game. It's not so much that
the art itself is badly drawn, as it is a feeling of a lot of wasted space.
If you were going to make the levels so spacious, it might have been a better
idea to use sprites to make a larger player and enemies (and don't complain
that this is too hard, because it's really not).
Also, there were a few graphical glitches involving the sword engine, which
you should have been able to clean up, and the sword itself just wasn't all
that impressive.
Plot: (30/45)
For a simple mission-based action game the plot and concept behind it was
actually pretty good. Because of this I've rated the plot a little higher
than I might otherwise have done.
Theme: (25/40)
This was fairly well on theme, though as I've said before, it might be better
to focus on the Internet itself, and not just computers in general. In fact,
the Internet didn't really have much to do with this at all. Still, the
environment did involve linking to other computers across a network, so it's
not off topic.
Innovation: (10/35)
I found the whole game rather ho hum, there wasn't really anything that hadn't
been seen before. Some points are awarded for effort, of course, I have to
assume that you're at least trying something new for yourself, but that's
about it.
Discretion: (02/20)
As always, points are taken off here for game stopping bugs. You also lost
quite a bit for that stunt you pulled on DMZX, trying to resubmit your game
because of said bug, more than a day after the competition was over.
Music: (10/35)
Caverns Remix? Maybe if you used some other songs in addition to that it would
be okay, but come on, dude, that's one step removed from a cardinal MZX sin.
Sound: (01/05)
No sound.
Total: (123/300)
Well, what can I say, this is another idea that looked good out of the gate,
but failed to produce aanything that could be called a solid game. Better
luck next time.

6047 Convergence (117/300) TRUST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gameplay: (15/70)
/* Comments */
Graphics: (25/50)
/* Comments */
Plot: (35/45)
/* Comments */
Theme: (25/40)
/* Comments */
Innovation: (10/35)
/* Comments */
Discretion: (05/20)
/* Comments */
Music: (01/35)
/* Comments */
Sound: (01/05)
/* Comments */
Total: (117/300)
/* Comments */

Ranking

By Category - Trust
Rank Team Game Name Score
1. 0261 Dark Core 229/300
2. 0666 Depravity 193/300
3. 0499 Shinrai 173/300
4. 0505 Vyznium 166/300
5. 0810 Trust Falls 161/300
6. 0215 Lethal Recurse 154/300
7. 0404 Serum 142/300
8. 0385 Gross Injustice 136/300
9. 1347 Castlevania: Drum Solo of Discombobulation 126/300
10. 6047 Convergence 117/300

By Category - The Internet
Rank Team Game Name Score
1. 0787 Innernet 224/300
2. 0777 Hackers Can Turn Your Computer Into A Bomb 219/300
3. 0222 Netsplit 182/300
4. 0160 The Evil Internet Virus 137/300
5. 1337 Paradigm AM 131/300
6. 4013 Hacker 123/300
7. 0331 Net Wars 071/300
8. 0344 Finite Space 067/300
9. 1777 Net Demon 031/300
10. 0776 WHY THE INTERNET IS BORING 027/300

All games - Flat Rank
Rank Team Game Name Score
1. 0261 Dark Core 229/300
2. 0787 Innernet 224/300
3. 0777 Hackers Can Turn Your Computer Into A Bomb 219/300
4. 0666 Depravity 193/300
5. 0222 Netsplit 182/300
6. 0499 Shinrai 173/300
7. 0505 Vyznium 166/300
8. 0810 Trust Falls 161/300
9. 0215 Lethal Recurse 154/300
10. 0404 Serum 142/300
11. 0160 The Evil Internet Virus 137/300
12. 0385 Gross Injustice 136/300
13. 1337 Paradigm AM 131/300
14. 1347 Castlevania: Drum Solo of Discombobulation 126/300
15. 4013 Hacker 123/300
16. 6047 Convergence 117/300
17. 0331 Net Wars 071/300
18. 0344 Finite Space 067/300
19. 1777 Net Demon 031/300
20. 0776 WHY THE INTERNET IS BORING 027/300

All games - Weight Rank
Rank Old Rank Team Game Name
1. 0261 Dark Core
2. 0787 Innernet
3. 0777 Hackers Can Turn Your Computer Into A Bomb
4. 1347 Castlevania: Drum Solo of Discombobulation
5. 0222 Netsplit
6. 0666 Depravity
7. 0505 Vyznium
8. 0499 Shinrai
9. 0810 Trust Falls
10. 0160 The Evil Internet Virus
11. 4013 Hacker
12. 6047 Convergence
13. 0215 Lethal Recurse
14. 0404 Serum
15. 0344 Finite Space
16. 0385 Gross Injustice
17. 1337 Paradigm AM
18. 0331 Net Wars
19. 1777 Net Demon
20. 0776 WHY THE INTERNET IS BORING</pre>

Summer 2003 Day of Zeux Judging Sheets:Wervyn - Revision history

Terryn: Created page with "
Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores Topics: General - Trust Specific - The Internet Judgment Criteria: Gameplay, 70/300 Gameplay is the meat of any MZX g..."

Summer 2003 Day of Zeux Judging Sheets:Wervyn - Revision history

Terryn: Created page with "Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores Topics: General - Trust Specific - The Internet Judgment Criteria: Gameplay, 70/300 Gameplay is the meat of any MZX g..."

Terryn: Created page with "
Summer 2003 DualStream Day of Zeux - Wervyn's Scores Topics: General - Trust Specific - The Internet Judgment Criteria: Gameplay, 70/300 Gameplay is the meat of any MZX g..."